Go to AFA About Us page
Go to AFA Communications page
Go to page
Go to AFA Contract & Negotiations page
Go to AFA Resources page
Go to AFA Adjuncts page
Go to Advocacy page
View/Print AFA Membership Application
Go to AFA Contacts page
Your Official Communication Channel - Sign up Here
Your Official Communication Channel - Sign up Here
 
 

HOT TOPICS !

Tentative Agreement (TA) Reached
Membership overwhelmingly approves TA!

Governor‘s 2016-17 State Budget Proposal (May 2016)

2016 CCC Salary Study

"Who’s Minding the Store?" AFA Dialogue

Your right to AFA representation: Weingarten Rights

New!
Article 16 MOUs

AFA Primers:
Load Banking(Art.32)
Hrly Asgmts(Art.16)

AFA Resolutions:
CCCCO Accred Rpt
Affordable Hlth Care
BoT Redistricting

Departmental
LOS lists posted
Length of Service

Read the latest
AFA Newsletters


Read the latest FACCC FACCCTS

FACCC: Get Involved, Membership Opt In

AB1469 CalSTRS DB Rate Increases eff. 7.1.14

AB340 CalSTRS PPT
Pension Reform Act of 2013

Seniority List for Regular Faculty

CCCI Repeatability Resolution 4.26.14

House Education & Workforce Cmte Rpt: "The Just–In–Time Professor"

SRJC Budget Basics 11.12.12

STATE BUDGET CRISIS
Read communications and find pertinent resource links


FACCC Contract Mbrshp
Proposals pass. Dues/fees assessment change to 0.74% will be implemented 1.31.12
=> FACCC FAQ's

Hot Topics Archive

 
 

THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY AND THE FUTURE OF YOUR UNION

For the past few months, AFA has been considering how a Trump-appointed Supreme Court Justice might impact the state of our union.

Last January, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, in which lawyers for Friedrichs sought to overturn a long settled precedent, Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977), which allowed public sector unions to charge service fees to non-members whom the union represented in collective bargaining, so as to help cover the costs of that bargaining.

The Court was expected to overturn Abood, potentially crippling the ability of public sector unions to bargain effectively for public employees, but Antonin Scalia's death in February left the court deadlocked at 4-4, giving precedence to the decision made by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had ruled in favor of the CTA and Fair Share Service Fees.

Looking ahead once again, AFA anticipates the Supreme Court will revisit this matter in the near future, but this time with a Trump-appointed Justice on the bench. This Court will most likely rule against Fair Share Service Fees, thereby greatly undermining the strength and solidarity of labor unions across this country.

Make no mistake, this decision will hurt public sector unions, including AFA. Your bargaining rights may be diminished. Wages and benefits may shrink; working conditions may deteriorate. Rights and benefits of part time faculty, in particular, may be abridged, and, nationally, the ability of public sector unions to stand up for sanity and decency in our collective politics will be put at serious risk.

An important step you can take to push back is to join the union, and pay regular dues instead of a service fee. Paying dues allows you full, active membership in the union. No court decision can take that away from you. Join our membership; become an officer; participate in a council meeting.

Now is the time for you to begin actively participating in the business of your union. Join us.

  Phone: 707⁄527–4731 FAX: 707⁄524–1762 Last Update: 11/23/16